<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GreensboroPolitics.com &#187; danny thompson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greensboropolitics.com/tag/danny-thompson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greensboropolitics.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Danny Thompson Supports Meeting Change on TV, but not in Chamber. Your take?</title>
		<link>http://greensboropolitics.com/danny-thompson-supports-meeting-change-on-tv-but-not-in-chamber-your-take/</link>
		<comments>http://greensboropolitics.com/danny-thompson-supports-meeting-change-on-tv-but-not-in-chamber-your-take/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ryan shell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danny thompson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greensboropolitics.com/?p=1236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tuesday night, the council took a bit of time to discuss the concept of moving the Speakers from the Floor portion of the meeting from the beginning to the end. During this time members generally took the time to say why the either supported the move or didn’t support the move. Let’s rewind a bit [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://greensboropolitics.com/danny-thompson-supports-meeting-change-on-tv-but-not-in-chamber-your-take/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Development Battle: Has College Hill Hurt Itself?</title>
		<link>http://greensboropolitics.com/development-battle-has-college-hill-hurt-itself/</link>
		<comments>http://greensboropolitics.com/development-battle-has-college-hill-hurt-itself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ryan shell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danny thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don vaughan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nancy vaughan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[save college hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zack Matheny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greensboropolitics.com/?p=1144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The College Hill neighborhood is currently fighting a proposed development that residents fear will hurt their neighborhood. The proposed Spring Garden development would be build where the Newman Machine Shop currently resides and calls for 720 apartments (need to clarify this # &#8211; residents used &#8220;apartments,&#8221; but it could be units) that will be geared [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://greensboropolitics.com/development-battle-has-college-hill-hurt-itself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

